The post with the '10 questions Lopera diabetics who want to leave ', written by BETICA the universe can be visited in alfinaldelapalmera.com . For references, this is my answer:
1 .- Lopera bought shares freely and legitimately?
Yes I suppose it was free and the legitimacy of law and money was awarded at that time. There is also audio-visual material to prove it. According to the video (jewel of lopera) where 'save the Betis', Lopera, through Farusa, transferred 800 million pesetas (4,808,097 Euros in 1992) for administrative relegation. Anyway, let's not forget that this whole situation is triggered by a law (the conversion SADs) that I consider a real fudge, of which Real Madrid, Barcelona, \u200b\u200bBilbao and Osasuna drew good use (and still do).
2 .- Do you then sell the right to freely and legitimately?
answer 'to the Galician', with another question: Lopera It forced someone to repeat ad nauseam that end up dividing their actions among diabetics? Is this compatible to sell to third parties, very free and legitimate it is? If this happens, we could Lopez said that has been deceiving us all this time, with a promise to hand out to all of us?
3 .- Lopera just bought the remaining shares it did not want anyone?
That I know, although it seems certain that he waited until the last minute to buy. I wonder what would have happened if the excess shares would not have been sufficient to control society. Would you have interest to buy Lopera in these conditions ...? We'll never know.
4 .- Why not buy then those who are now demanding their sale?
assume you're referring to the 'remarkable', given that between the 'creatures', bought all she could and did. They wanted many, but few could. Still, the Betis fans was the most capital (in millions of pesetas) signed between all the clubs that had to do the conversion in SAD, as I have understood. I imagine you, like other lopera (and the same Lopera) think that behind every protest against management are always remarkable. However, there are many diabetics who only want a FREE no Lopera Betis, but also without Galera. This is not a "war" between Lopez and the notables, is a current part of the 'sovereign people'. Not mix concepts we do not want to use us, neither.
5 .- Real Betis lived a glorious stage the years before the arrival of swarming Second Lopera when playing against affiliates sports cities?
Although you have answered (very well indeed) on the blog, you just say that Betis was infinitely more worthy, more respectable, more equipment and more institution will never Betis Lopera. That was the Betis that I sucked, which I fell in love and who was walking in Spain (first, second or third) as a source of pride for our city and a reference for other hobbies.
6 .- Would there today as a team Real Betis Balompié centennial, historical and legendary if Lopez had not made that last day that payment to enforce the law that swept away to other clubs?
But what Centennial team, historical and legendary you mean ... if Betis Lopera was born in 1992 according to? Lopera Betis now has 17. What before was a 'equipillo' that (see question No. 5) swarmed by the second play in sports cities against affiliates, no? Let us be serious. The institution, supported mainly by a large and loyal fans, despite Lopez's centennial (the damage he did, by pure ego, the events celebrating our 100 years can not be repaired ya).
7 .- How we would look the other club in town after vanishing if we had refounded as FC Betis, without a stadium, no Real, no football, no manque lost and without 100 years of history?
reiterate that the dignity of a club is not in your name or in its stadium, either in its title ... Remember these words of William Wallace in Mel Gibson film Braveheart entitled: "You can take our lives, but we never removed ... !!!'. freedom Well, unfortunately, that's what we have been removed. I also believe that we must not act, to get a club to the level they deserve the diabetics, according to 'how we look at the other club in the city. "
8 .- Someone who wants to destroy the club and is not Betic makes his efforts all these years: the last on de Oliveira?
This year we have signed it. I affirm that all diabetics. Also, we want to go Lopera, although many suspect that now that there is Chaparro (in my opinion, the main 'trigger' of these signings, by the way he has managed to deal with Lopera) next year will again see midlands and balances. Serra Ferrer and Chaparro only have been able to get the Betis players needed. By the way, do not forget great player like Sergio Garcia and Nelson. Eman talk another day, to lengthen it.
9 .- Statistically have been higher the last 16 years than the average club in the rest of his story? Reza
a saying that there are three kinds of lies: white lies, lies, fat, and statistics. It is true that 2005 was a great year, but it is also true that the cycle has finished Lopera. Why do not these statistics, and others on the satisfaction of fans with club management and team performance in the last 4 years?
10 .- He built Lopera the middle stage and maliciously aggravate the Betic or did with the idea of \u200b\u200bfinishing?
Who cares? What matters is not what you think, or idea you have, but it is gone. It's a shame. Every summer the south goal strip, or at least, is what Lopez is tired of promises. How many years will have to continue listening to this song to consider is fooling us with this also?
Finally, say that 'fashion' of antiloperismo has some years, and is not intended to go against a specific person, but against anyone who abducts a feeling centennial, a hobby only as a 'critters' that bleed every weekend with a team as sick as its owner, as selfish as his master, as crappy as its owner and does not respond to the ideal that for decades has been the flag of the Betis: freedom , humility, respect ... and two balls' as two melons "to leave them on the lawn, no matter who the opponent. Enough of this Betis country houses and outdated. Lopez go now.
